(PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson

La révolution Holacracy review ´ 3 Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary AVANT PROPOS DE BERNARD MARIE CHIUET IGI PARTNERS Le modèle Holacracy a bouleversé mon univers David Allen Voici enfin un ouvrage du créateur de Holacracy ui montre le fonctionnement et la mise en oeuvre de ce nouveau système révolutionnaire de management des entreprises Holacracy est un système très structuré offrant aux gens le pouvoir d. A process heavy straightjacket for organizations that can t figure out how to delegate the rules of communication The Twelve Links révolutionnaire de management des entreprises Holacracy est un système très structuré offrant aux gens le pouvoir d. A process heavy straightjacket for organizations that can t figure out how to delegate the The Case Of The Missing Necklace rules of communication

review La révolution Holacracy

La révolution Holacracy

La révolution Holacracy review ´ 3 Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary E prendre des décisions en fonction de la nature de leur travail leurs rôles et non de leur titre leur poste Il en résulte Le management traditionnel Des réunions pénibles déstructurées ou peu structurées Une structure organisationnelle rigide Une conception organisationnelle axée sur le PDG Les managers sont des freins à la prise de dé. Holacracy is a governance system and a registered trademark owned by HolacracyOne The word Holacracy is very easy to confuse with holocracy with an o which means universal democracy Robertson s aim with the system is to harness the tremendous sensing power of the human consciousness available to our organizations p 7 This harnessing is done by a set of core rules p 12 The Holacracy constitution acts as the core rule book for the organization p 21 Robertson hopes that his readers will approach the book not as a set of ideas principles or philosophies but as a guide to a new practice pp 13 14Brian Robertson s book is very readable and informative I share Robertson s view on the problems associated with predict and control p 7 and his interest in finding better ways to work together p 12 but I can also see problems with heavily rule based approaches I think there s a fundamental difference between following rules and honoring agreements Rules are externally focused while agreements are internal because they are directly linked to will Agreements not rules are the glue that ties commitment to resultsBrian Robertson focuses on practices in his book while my interest primarily is on principles This doesn t mean that I think practices are unimportant I share however Ralph Waldo Emerson s view that The man who grasps principles can successfully select his own methods The man who tries methods ignoring principles is sure to have trouble To paraphrase Emerson the man who focus on rules and processes ignoring principles is sure to have trouble I also think that processes need to grow or evolve from their specific context Each situation is uniue in some way small or largeFor Brian Robertson it s very important to prevent others from claiming power over you p 21 This is done by establishing a core authority structure and a system that empowers everyone p 21 The power is in the process which is defined in detail p 21 For me harnessing true self organization and agility throughout an enterprise p 20 is an oxymoron a contradiction in terms Harnessing self organization might actually kill it I suspect people might decide to withdraw their engagement if they realize that they are harnessed for the benefit of the organization onlyBrian Robertson defines a circle not as a group of people but as a group of roles p 48 The basic circle structure consists of nested circles p 47 Robertson calls the hierarchy of nested circles a holarchy p 46 Arthur Koestler defines a holon as a whole that is a part of a larger whole and a holarchy as the connection between holons p 38 I d challenge that a hierarchy of nested circles really is a holarchy A person certainly is a holon but I doubt that a role in itself is a holon What inherent wholeness does a role have if people are needed to energize the role and enact its accountabilities p 43 Having said that I do think that a group of people can become and act as a holon under certain circumstances Maybe Bohmian Dialogue the U process and Open Space Technology are examples when such circumstances can occurThe nested circles in the basic circle structure are linked via two special roles the Lead and Rep Links p 49 The idea behind this interlinking of circles comes from the Sociocratic Circle Organization Method Sociocracy which was invented by Gerard Endenburg in the 1970s Brian Robertson tried to patent the idea Pub No US2009006113 A1 Fig 4 but subseuently abandoned the patent application Other ideas in the patent application similar to Sociocracy are the decision making Fig 6 governance meeting Fig 8 and role election Fig 9 processes A significant difference between Sociocracy and Holacracy is that all roles are elected in Sociocracy while only the Rep Link Facilitator and Secretary are elected roles in Holacracy p 57 Holacracy is also prescriptive The responsibility of people in a Holacracy is to act as role fillers This is a sacred duty and an act of love and service not for your own sake but nonetheless of your own free will p 85 Holacracy empowers you to use your own best judgment to energize your role and do your work p 97 I cannot help but wonder why people can t empower themselves Why do you need the permission of a system to use your own best judgment in your workIn addition to the basic responsibility as role fillers people also have specific duties in offering transparency processing reuests and accepting certain rules of prioritization p 92 Transparency and effectiveness are important in Sociocracy too However euivalence doesn t seem to be as important in Holacracy as in Sociocracy In Holacracy the process is all that matters and the process will take care of everything else p 111 The rules in Holacracy create a sacred space that frees each of us to act as sensors for the organization without drama getting in the way p 110 As long as the process is honored you really don t care how anyone feels at least not in your role as facilitator p 110 I ask myself aren t feelings important if people are going to be able to act as sensors The answer Brian Robertson gives is that it s about processing tensions for the sake of our roles which ultimately serve the organization s purpose p 113 This keeps the organization from being overly influenced by individual feelings and opinions that are not relevant to the work p 116 He assures that No one s voice is silenced yet egos aren t allowed to dominate p 117 Well really Yes says Robertson Holacracy seeks to process every tension and be truly integrative it s also a recipe for not letting ego fear or groupthink hinder the organization s purpose p 125 Playing politics loses its utility p 126 I think that the politics of identifying issues and building support that is strong enough to result in action will always be there It s great if the politics can be channeled through Holacracy If not it will go undergroundOne of Brian Robertson s favorite metaphors used to illustrate the dynamic steering and constant weaving is riding a bicycle p 129 Interestingly this is the same metaphor which Gerard Endenburg uses to illustrate the circle process in Sociocracy References G Endenburg Sociocracy The organization of decision making pp 16 18 and G Endenburg Sociocracy As Social Design pp 67 71 Robertson explains that Dynamic steering means constant adjustment in light of real feedback which makes for a organic and emergent path p 129 Dynamic steering done well enables the organization and those within it to stay present and act decisively on whatever arises day to day p 130 The focus is on uickly reaching a workable decision and then let reality inform the next step p 131 As in Sociocracy any decision can be revisited at any time p 131 I think the dynamic steering is a major strength of both Holacracy and SociocracyHolacracy defines the organization as an entity that exists beyond the people with its own purpose to enact and with work to do beyond just serving the people doing that work p 148 This is also why Holacracy isn t a governance process of the people by the people for the people but of the organization through the people for the purpose p 34 Holacracy differentiates between the human community and the organizational entity p 149 and between the role and soul pp 42 46 To summarize Holacracy s systems and processes are about continually helping the organization find its own uniue identity and structure to do its work in the world while protecting it from human agendas egos and politics p 199 Still the organization needs human beings to energize and enact all its rolesHolacracy is a big shift p 145 Brian Robertson emphasizes that you can t really practice Holacracy by adopting only part of the rules but you can take on all of the rules in only part of the company p 147 Holacracy isn t for everyone Robertson has seen organizations where it just didn t stick p 167 The three most common scenarios he has identified are The Reluctant to Let Go Leader The Uncooperative Middle and The Stopping Short Syndrome p 167 The last scenario is perhaps the most insidious p 170 because slowly and almost imperceptibly the change starts to fade p 170 At best the organization ends up with a surface level improvement only p 171 I don t think this is a scenario uniue to Holacracy Regardless Robertson claims that a majority of the Holacracy implementations he has witnessed seems to result in lasting transformation p 173Brian Robertson acknowledges at the end of the book that he is grateful to his mother for her great job in catalyzing the development of his strong and healthy ego p 211 Robertson writes that he has a solid sense of self throughout p 211 Unless he hadn t had such a strong and healthy ego he wouldn t have needed a system capable of protecting others from it p 212 To me this sounds contradictory I can understand if a person with a weak ego seeks protection in rules but not why others would need protection from a person with a solid self and healthy ego Maybe there are some deeply human needs behind Brian Robertson s birthing of Holacracy For one reason or another Robertson perceives a need for a strong rule based system It s up to you to decide if you need such a system too If so it s called Holacracy Blackmailed by Her Big Brother rôles et non de leur titre leur poste Il en Alicia in Blunderland résulte Le management traditionnel Des Magische Heilkunst réunions pénibles déstructurées ou peu structurées Une structure organisationnelle En helt annan historia rigide Une conception organisationnelle axée sur le PDG Les managers sont des freins à la prise de dé. Holacracy is a governance system and a Recruitment The Resistance Trilogy #1 registered trademark owned by HolacracyOne The word Holacracy is very easy to confuse with holocracy with an o which means universal democracy Robertson s aim with the system is to harness the tremendous sensing power of the human consciousness available to our organizations p 7 This harnessing is done by a set of core The Terror Timeline Year by Year Day by Day Minute by Minute A Comprehensive Chronicle of the Road to 911 and America's Response rules p 12 The Holacracy constitution acts as the core Das Hildegard von Bingen Kochbuch Die besten Rezepte der Hildegard Küche rule book for the organization p 21 Robertson hopes that his Die Kunst Mit Meinem Geld Auszukommen readers will approach the book not as a set of ideas principles or philosophies but as a guide to a new practice pp 13 14Brian Robertson s book is very Die Optimierungsfalle readable and informative I share Robertson s view on the problems associated with predict and control p 7 and his interest in finding better ways to work together p 12 but I can also see problems with heavily His Woman His Wife His Widow rule based approaches I think there s a fundamental difference between following Die Erbin rules and honoring agreements Rules are externally focused while agreements are internal because they are directly linked to will Agreements not White Moon on the Mountain Peak rules are the glue that ties commitment to Sub TerraDas Blut des Teufels resultsBrian Robertson focuses on practices in his book while my interest primarily is on principles This doesn t mean that I think practices are unimportant I share however Ralph Waldo Emerson s view that The man who grasps principles can successfully select his own methods The man who tries methods ignoring principles is sure to have trouble To paraphrase Emerson the man who focus on Deadly Lust rules and processes ignoring principles is sure to have trouble I also think that processes need to grow or evolve from their specific context Each situation is uniue in some way small or largeFor Brian Robertson it s very important to prevent others from claiming power over you p 21 This is done by establishing a core authority structure and a system that empowers everyone p 21 The power is in the process which is defined in detail p 21 For me harnessing true self organization and agility throughout an enterprise p 20 is an oxymoron a contradiction in terms Harnessing self organization might actually kill it I suspect people might decide to withdraw their engagement if they Unholy Sacrifice realize that they are harnessed for the benefit of the organization onlyBrian Robertson defines a circle not as a group of people but as a group of My Lady Governess Zebra Regency Romance roles p 48 The basic circle structure consists of nested circles p 47 Robertson calls the hierarchy of nested circles a holarchy p 46 Arthur Koestler defines a holon as a whole that is a part of a larger whole and a holarchy as the connection between holons p 38 I d challenge that a hierarchy of nested circles Spells really is a holarchy A person certainly is a holon but I doubt that a Der Dschihadist role in itself is a holon What inherent wholeness does a Die Chaosschwestern leben wild Die Chaosschwestern Reihe #7 role have if people are needed to energize the The Peripheral Cocksucker Book II role and enact its accountabilities p 43 Having said that I do think that a group of people can become and act as a holon under certain circumstances Maybe Bohmian Dialogue the U process and Open Space Technology are examples when such circumstances can occurThe nested circles in the basic circle structure are linked via two special The Aztlanian Rithmatist #2 roles the Lead and Rep Links p 49 The idea behind this interlinking of circles comes from the Sociocratic Circle Organization Method Sociocracy which was invented by Gerard Endenburg in the 1970s Brian Robertson tried to patent the idea Pub No US2009006113 A1 Fig 4 but subseuently abandoned the patent application Other ideas in the patent application similar to Sociocracy are the decision making Fig 6 governance meeting Fig 8 and DNA role election Fig 9 processes A significant difference between Sociocracy and Holacracy is that all Bengal Divided 1905 1971 roles are elected in Sociocracy while only the Rep Link Facilitator and Secretary are elected DevSimran roles in Holacracy p 57 Holacracy is also prescriptive The DevSimran responsibility of people in a Holacracy is to act as Ruthless Bertoli Crime Family #3 role fillers This is a sacred duty and an act of love and service not for your own sake but nonetheless of your own free will p 85 Holacracy empowers you to use your own best judgment to energize your Fire Watch role and do your work p 97 I cannot help but wonder why people can t empower themselves Why do you need the permission of a system to use your own best judgment in your workIn addition to the basic Sweet Carolina Morning Willow Hill #2 responsibility as Das vergessene Reich Weltenmagie #2 role fillers people also have specific duties in offering transparency processing The Forever Ship reuests and accepting certain Das vergessene Reich Weltenmagie #2 rules of prioritization p 92 Transparency and effectiveness are important in Sociocracy too However euivalence doesn t seem to be as important in Holacracy as in Sociocracy In Holacracy the process is all that matters and the process will take care of everything else p 111 The The Patriotic Murders rules in Holacracy create a sacred space that frees each of us to act as sensors for the organization without drama getting in the way p 110 As long as the process is honored you Die Krumpflinge Egon wird erwischt really don t care how anyone feels at least not in your The Instant Millionaire role as facilitator p 110 I ask myself aren t feelings important if people are going to be able to act as sensors The answer Brian Robertson gives is that it s about processing tensions for the sake of our Become a Psychic Wanderer roles which ultimately serve the organization s purpose p 113 This keeps the organization from being overly influenced by individual feelings and opinions that are not The Little Italian Bakery relevant to the work p 116 He assures that No one s voice is silenced yet egos aren t allowed to dominate p 117 Well The Little Italian Bakery really Yes says Robertson Holacracy seeks to process every tension and be truly integrative it s also a Die Wahrheit und andere Lügen recipe for not letting ego fear or groupthink hinder the organization s purpose p 125 Playing politics loses its utility p 126 I think that the politics of identifying issues and building support that is strong enough to Insurgent result in action will always be there It s great if the politics can be channeled through Holacracy If not it will go undergroundOne of Brian Robertson s favorite metaphors used to illustrate the dynamic steering and constant weaving is Sweet Southern Hearts A Willow Hill Novel #3 riding a bicycle p 129 Interestingly this is the same metaphor which Gerard Endenburg uses to illustrate the circle process in Sociocracy References G Endenburg Sociocracy The organization of decision making pp 16 18 and G Endenburg Sociocracy As Social Design pp 67 71 Robertson explains that Dynamic steering means constant adjustment in light of uimera real feedback which makes for a organic and emergent path p 129 Dynamic steering done well enables the organization and those within it to stay present and act decisively on whatever arises day to day p 130 The focus is on uickly The High Lord reaching a workable decision and then let The High Lord reality inform the next step p 131 As in Sociocracy any decision can be La Nina Errante revisited at any time p 131 I think the dynamic steering is a major strength of both Holacracy and SociocracyHolacracy defines the organization as an entity that exists beyond the people with its own purpose to enact and with work to do beyond just serving the people doing that work p 148 This is also why Holacracy isn t a governance process of the people by the people for the people but of the organization through the people for the purpose p 34 Holacracy differentiates between the human community and the organizational entity p 149 and between the Sacrilege role and soul pp 42 46 To summarize Holacracy s systems and processes are about continually helping the organization find its own uniue identity and structure to do its work in the world while protecting it from human agendas egos and politics p 199 Still the organization needs human beings to energize and enact all its An Outsider’s Guide to Statically Typed Functional Programming rolesHolacracy is a big shift p 145 Brian Robertson emphasizes that you can t Die Wahrheit und andere Lügen really practice Holacracy by adopting only part of the The Truth Commission rules but you can take on all of the Die Hummerkönige rules in only part of the company p 147 Holacracy isn t for everyone Robertson has seen organizations where it just didn t stick p 167 The three most common scenarios he has identified are The Reluctant to Let Go Leader The Uncooperative Middle and The Stopping Short Syndrome p 167 The last scenario is perhaps the most insidious p 170 because slowly and almost imperceptibly the change starts to fade p 170 At best the organization ends up with a surface level improvement only p 171 I don t think this is a scenario uniue to Holacracy Regardless Robertson claims that a majority of the Holacracy implementations he has witnessed seems to La hora de la revancha ¡Gol #10 result in lasting transformation p 173Brian Robertson acknowledges at the end of the book that he is grateful to his mother for her great job in catalyzing the development of his strong and healthy ego p 211 Robertson writes that he has a solid sense of self throughout p 211 Unless he hadn t had such a strong and healthy ego he wouldn t have needed a system capable of protecting others from it p 212 To me this sounds contradictory I can understand if a person with a weak ego seeks protection in Los vampiros originales El uinto sello III rules but not why others would need protection from a person with a solid self and healthy ego Maybe there are some deeply human needs behind Brian Robertson s birthing of Holacracy For one Romances de Tango Coleccion Biografias y Documentos reason or another Robertson perceives a need for a strong You Had Me at Hello World rule based system It s up to you to decide if you need such a system too If so it s called Holacracy

characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson

La révolution Holacracy review ´ 3 Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary Cision L'holacracy Des réunions clairement ciblées et cohérentes Une structure organisationnelle évolutive Une conception locale et distribuée de l'organisation Une structure claire pour une prise de décision distribuée Je vous recommande vivement cet ouvrage comme bible Holacracy si vous recherchez une nouvelle méthode de travail Tony Hsi. Many good ideas but for my taste too extreme and too process heavy I like the idea of circles and roles and how autonomy and accountability is shifted I also appreciate the separation of meta level from the operations What I have a hard time with is imagining adults liking being put into a strict process straightjacket I just don t think that process alone will magically cure all problems of modern organizationsHolacracy feels to me like its to teal organization what Scrum is for AgileOverall a decent 35


10 thoughts on “(PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

  1. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson Holacracy is a system for structuring a business through peer to peer self organization and distributed control in which we all get to be adults togetherokay so 1 Holacracy doesn't stand up under Marxian analysis Power is not actually being distributed when workers are still selling their labor and the value of their efforts is take

  2. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    review La révolution Holacracy Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson It is well written and persuasive It is also a dangerous management system that can undermine a company as it did with mine when we tried to implement it It nearly brought us down My takeaway is that there is no system that can repl

  3. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    review La révolution Holacracy (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson A process heavy straightjacket for organizations that can't figure out how to delegate the rules of communication

  4. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary Holacracy® is a governance system

  5. says: Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson review La révolution Holacracy Before I start I don't think I'm able to properly review this book with reviewing the concept of Holocracy itself It's technically possible but it doesn't make IMHO much senseThe overall concept of Holocracy to replace inefficient t

  6. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    review La révolution Holacracy Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson This book does a great job at showcasing Holacracy a new management system that distributes authority and accountability th

  7. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson

    (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary review La révolution Holacracy I read this book because it was discussed in Reinventing Organizations as a complete system for running things under self organising principles Unlike Reinventing Organizations this book is not intended to be an inspirational guide

  8. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson review La révolution Holacracy

    (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary review La révolution Holacracy I was reading a short stories science fiction anthology at the same time; and the two books felt interchangeable I had always been interested in aspects of holacracy and reading this book in its entirety demonstrated how off base I

  9. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson review La révolution Holacracy

    (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson Many good ideas but for my taste too extreme and too process heavy I like the idea of circles and roles and how autonomy and accountability is shifted I also appreciate the separation of meta level from the operations What I have a hard time with is imagining adults liking being put into a strict process straigh

  10. says: (PDF/EPUB) [La révolution Holacracy] Ï Brian J. Robertson Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary review La révolution Holacracy

    review La révolution Holacracy Brian J. Robertson ✓ 3 summary characters ↠ eBook or Kindle ePUB ✓ Brian J. Robertson A great example of how self managing organizations can work successfully As a person interested in particular in practical implementations over theoretical possibilities I found the book a great combination of both Even if Holacracy does not fit your organization I recommend the book to everyone who believe in the idea of

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Kindle Edition
  • 256
  • La révolution Holacracy
  • Brian J. Robertson
  • French
  • 09 July 2020
  • null